twitter

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

A Son for My Gun – Part II



           The gun control issue has many faces.  It is a complex problem.  The positions taken by liberals who support the destruction of every gun in America and abolishing  the production of any additional firearms is just as closed-minded and dangerous as the far right conservative perspective that every American has the right under the constitution to own any form of firearm and display them for the entire world to see.  Both extremes have potentially dangerous consequences that could end in violence and the deaths of many innocent people, including recurrences of Sandy Hook. 
            If you support the idea of a complete ban of guns then you are being naïve and not accepting some harsh truths about our society and the boogie men that walk our streets.  That is not paranoia but an unfortunate fact.  Just as laws in the past did not stop people from drinking alcohol during prohibition or women getting illegal and dangerous abortions (all of whom were technically criminals in the eyes of the law at the time), the abolition of guns will not stop criminals from finding the means of arming themselves, while law abiding citizens will be left defenseless.  Such a law may deter an event like Sandy Hook or Columbine, but I believe it will enable more violence and criminal activity than it will stop.  Just as a patrol car will get everyone on the street to obey the speed limit, or even the sight of a uniformed police officer will prevent a crime from being committed, the understanding that an average citizen may have the means of defending themselves will deter many criminals from engaging in criminal activity.  A woman walking down the street alone has a larger criminal target audience than the same woman walking along side a man.  There is even additional deterrence if the guy is a giant at 6’7”.  Criminals are not irrational.  They are calculating individuals and want their booty with as little effort and risk as possible.  If the crook believes that there is a good chance that they could become the victim they simply look for an easier target.
            In addition, this fear of the all powerful assault rifle, with its ominous black outline and alien looking design, is misguided.  Reality is that the majority of gun related violence, including mass shootings, are carried out with handguns.  In fact, I was recently talking to a police officer friend and he admitted that if he wanted to commit such a heinous crime (hypothetically of course) he would chose a crowded area and start with a fully loaded pump action shotgun spraying over a hundred high velocity pellets into groups of people with only 7 shots, and then follow that up with two handguns.  He is certain that within a matter of a few minutes there would be over 50 people dead or seriously wounded.  That is a frightening thought.  
            On the other end of the debate, beliefs of the NRA and far right supporters who fear that we have to be prepared for the remote possibility of the evil empire suppressing and dictating helpless American citizens such as previous tyrannies (the Third Reich and Mussolini), is fear mongering ideation.  Is there a possibility of such a future for America?  Of course there is.  However, even without every one of us armed and dangerous, the likelihood of such a radical takeover is slim to none.  And that is also the truth.  Contrary to what radicals think and fear, the President of the United States, whether a democrat or republican; white, black or any shade in between; or a man or woman; is far from a dictator and the means of gaining such authority is nearly impossible.  The founding fathers established our government with the intent of preventing such a tyrannical government.  The President would have to re-write the constitution with the support of both divisions of congress and the judiciary branch.  The military would be called to turn their weapons on their own brothers and sisters.  In addition to the federal government there are 50 independent state governments with similar constitutions.  Each state has its own militia as does their individual cities.  It would be a mass undertaking, involving all levels of corruption, to successfully pull off such a coup. 
Reality is that such fearful ideology is an excuse for something that they want to have, not what they believe they need to have.  There is a difference.  And truth be told, even if we could have any weapon we wanted, unless we owned drone strike capability, F22 Raptors, Apache and Cobra attack helicopters, tanks, laser guided missiles and bunker busters to name a few, we would still be inadequately armed against a tyrannical government.  Unlimited freedom of the second amendment would not protect us. 

I apologize.  Once again, I have rambled too long to get to what I believe is the real issue that has to be solved to prevent additional tragedies like those in Connecticut, Texas and Colorado.  At the heart of the problem is a sickness that is plaguing our society.  It is a mental illness that is unweaving our social fabric resulting in antisocial behaviors.  These vary in severity such as someone’s impatience while they are waiting in an ER for a non life threatening sore throat, trampling people to death during a shopping frenzy, the need to post every bit of useless information about our lives on social media, our need to find happiness by buying ‘things’ with money we don’t have, a wall street predator who will con someone out of their life savings for a commission, our big banks and other corporate executives who expect to be paid millions in bonuses while failing their customers, and even going on a murderous killing spree victimizing innocent people including children.  These are all a symptom of the same disease that is slowly taking away our humanity and our ability to function as a society.

No comments:

Post a Comment